forum.sports-pro.co.uk Forum Index forum.sports-pro.co.uk
A discussion forum devoted to people who want to talk about sports and sports betting! People without a sense of humour need not apply!!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Matt Prior Dropped For NZ Series

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    forum.sports-pro.co.uk Forum Index -> General Sport.... Rugby, Boxing Ect -> Cricket
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Hampton
Group Performer
Group Performer


Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 4416
Location: Somerset, Although Sometimes Surrey!

PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 1:58 pm    Post subject: Matt Prior Dropped For NZ Series Reply with quote

England have dropped Matt Prior from the Test side to tour New Zealand in a few weeks time.

They will Take Wicketkeppers Phil Mustard & Tim Ambrose who will have to compete for the Wicket Keepers job.

Prior did seem to have made the job his with some good games late last year but a poor performance in the last Test against Sri Lanka seems to have been to much for the England selectors.

England seem to be having great trouble in finding a suitable & perminate Wicket Keeper right now!


_________________
SBH Comp 2008 - Runner Up
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
archie mackenzie
Group Performer
Group Performer


Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Posts: 2400

PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hello hampton
i feel that england should just go back to having a wicketkeeper who is purely just a wicketkeeper,get back to basics if you like the keepers job is just to keep wicket,forget about having a keeper/batsmen,if he chips in a few runs fair enough but has long has he takes catches/stumpings when they come along that will do for me and let the batsmen do they job score runs
cheers archie.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hampton
Group Performer
Group Performer


Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 4416
Location: Somerset, Although Sometimes Surrey!

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

archie

I away I agree with you, but these days Test sides want a keeper who can score a few runs although you could have someone like Jack Russell who was not seen as a Wicket/Batsman but was well capable of chipping in with some runs!  They would need to pick another batsman to counteract the balance & right now I can not see where another batsman would come from!
_________________
SBH Comp 2008 - Runner Up
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Flatz
Listed Winner
Listed Winner


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 823

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with Archie.  A wicketkeeper that drops one or two chances per innings could easily cost the team around 100 runs or more on occasions.  Lets face it there ain't gonna be many keepers that will make those runs up when batting.  It would be nice to have somebody like Gilchrist in the England side, but that ain't happening anytime soon I fear.

Cheers

Flatz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
awaywardlad
Group Performer
Group Performer


Joined: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 2338

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I read an interesting article some years ago in which the author stated for Test cricket you should pick your 6 best batsmen(irrespective of what number they bat for their county) then your 4 best bowlers(irrespective of their actions/speed etc) and your best wicketkeeper.

It was either M.Brearley or AR Lewis both of whom were very successful England captains.The writer suggested that constant compromise meant that the "best" players left out for an inferior all-rounder type quickly became disaffected or tried to change their game which more often than not did not work.
_________________
Always remember you're unique,just like everyone else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
archie mackenzie
Group Performer
Group Performer


Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Posts: 2400

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

what you fellas think of englands chances in the series v new zealand???
after the complete shambles of the ashes series i didnt follow the following england series but got my enthusiam back and looking forward to staying up and watching some decent cricket from england and imo they should be beating new zealand or at least not losing
btw did any heads roll after the shambles of australia???probably not.cheers archie.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hampton
Group Performer
Group Performer


Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 4416
Location: Somerset, Although Sometimes Surrey!

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Flatz wrote:
I agree with Archie.  A wicketkeeper that drops one or two chances per innings could easily cost the team around 100 runs or more on occasions.  Lets face it there ain't gonna be many keepers that will make those runs up when batting.  It would be nice to have somebody like Gilchrist in the England side, but that ain't happening anytime soon I fear.

Cheers

Flatz


Everyone would love a Gilcreast in their side! The problem is England haven't got one!  

How many Wicketkeepers have we tried in the last two years!  
_________________
SBH Comp 2008 - Runner Up
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Hampton
Group Performer
Group Performer


Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 4416
Location: Somerset, Although Sometimes Surrey!

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

archie mackenzie wrote:
what you fellas think of englands chances in the series v new zealand???
after the complete shambles of the ashes series i didnt follow the following england series but got my enthusiam back and looking forward to staying up and watching some decent cricket from england and imo they should be beating new zealand or at least not losing
btw did any heads roll after the shambles of australia???probably not.cheers archie.


If England play to their best, which means every player has to perform they are capable of beating NZ.  We might of beaten S.L. if everybody had chipped in but we only had bits & bobs from some. We migt of done with abit of good fortune (How come the Ozzies always getr the rub of the green?!   ).

NZ have looked below par against Bangladesh & have slightly struggled against a team lowly rated.

England latest form means they are now ranked along side the likes of NZ so it could be a close series.
_________________
SBH Comp 2008 - Runner Up
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
awaywardlad
Group Performer
Group Performer


Joined: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 2338

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think we are a better side than NZ - just!If it we were playing at home I would fancy us to win it but as we're away I'll go for a drawn series as this is the value bet I think.

Series odds from Stan James as :-

NZ - 11/4
Draw - 10/3
US - 4/6
_________________
Always remember you're unique,just like everyone else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hampton
Group Performer
Group Performer


Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 4416
Location: Somerset, Although Sometimes Surrey!

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmmm! Trust the bookies not to give too much away when pricing up England in Test Matches!  

England Odds On over NZ....b*******s!    
_________________
SBH Comp 2008 - Runner Up
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
archie mackenzie
Group Performer
Group Performer


Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Posts: 2400

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

just looked at the new zealand diary before england arrive and not the best preparation to face england,2 tests against bangladesh and then just one dayers,the stats say 41 tests played 22 have been drawn,england won 16,new zealand 3.cheers archie.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    forum.sports-pro.co.uk Forum Index -> General Sport.... Rugby, Boxing Ect -> Cricket All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum