| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
glennie1970 Handicapper

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 471 Location: Ashford, Kent UK
|
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jennywales wrote: | Rapid, I understand your reasoning. However, the advantage of allowing people to hold more than one share, if they can afford it, is that as the number of shares (not shareholders) goes up, the price of each share comes down. By limiting ownership to one share, unless we can actually get 40 individual shareholders, which I doubt - although it is worth trying - we would probably, because of the increase in cost per head, make the whole scheme unworkable.
I know that there are potential members who would not be able to fund an increase in share price, and would as a consequence have to drop out, thus making the price of a share even higher, because of the lower numbers of shareholders available.
I do however think that everyone, whether they have one share or more, must be treated equally (that is, equal voice in decision making, and equal distribution of owners' privileges). This means that the only inequality would be if the share price were reduced because of prizes, and I think we have already so far pretty much agreed that in the lucky event of prize money this would go back into the pot to provide a cushion for unforeseen expenditure and to reduce the monthly contribution; those with more shares would benefit a bit more than those with fewer.
Thoughts, people, please!! |
a good summing up Jen
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rapidlateheadway Listed Winner


Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 938 Location: Moray
|
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, I fully understand what you are saying.
One share is all i`m interested in at the minute. I maybe wrong but I feel Toastie would be thinking the same.
The main point here is we have 19 people interested, with Glennie`s estimated up take of 27/40 shares. This is very good. I`ve got someone in mind to take a share and Mr Toast has also got somebody in mind. I feel out of the 19 people IF, and only IF, we could each persuade a mate,partner,spouse etc to take a share each this would give us 38 members. I know it may not be possible for everyone to bring someone to the party, but only then should we offer extra shares to the original 19. At that point I`m prepared to review my own position.
I know i`m looking for Utopia getting 40 members with a 2.5% shareholding each, But theres nothing wrong with looking for perfection, IS THERE ??????
I also feel there is enough interest and if we get to having a meeting with 20+ members and we`ve got the extra shares up our sleeve, we should be very well placed to proceed.
Rapid |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kickingkyle Group Performer


Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 6611 Location: Leicester
|
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I dont have a problem with anyone having more shares. I think its better that way as it causes less problems with admin etc. _________________ Wolves winner 20.1.08 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rapidlateheadway Listed Winner


Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 938 Location: Moray
|
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
KK. I personally dont see an advantage having more than one share, but if others do then they are welcome to them. It just increases the outlay for a start and increases the monthly fees. The only plus I can see is the increased share of prize money and I`m not going to get excited about that.
All these issues will come out in the wash I`m sure.
Rapid |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
glennie1970 Handicapper

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 471 Location: Ashford, Kent UK
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rapid have reduced you and Toastie down to one share from my original thread which I update as and when.This is now moved here;
Update on all interested members (Iwill edit this post as and when we get new people or number of shares are confirmed)
Jennywales 2 shares
Costafox 2 shares
Rapidlateheadway 1 shares
Yaiyam 2 shares
Rathven Toast 1 shares
Sky of Darkness 4 shares
Mansfield Toon 1 share
Newseeker 1 share
Skanky 1 share
Jairducochet 1 share
Golfswing 1 share
Chewster 1 share
NoDough 1 share
Glennie 1 share
Harchiefan 1 share
Pickles 1 share
Jejquade 1 share
Dom 1 share
Nick1176 1 share
Blueboy 1 share
Shamardal 1 share
Bobby W 1 share
Westmeadhawk 1 share
this accounts for 29 of the 40 shares. I have listed everyone who has shown an interest and tried to gauge how many shares they will likely have. It would be useful to know if people are looking for more or less shares based upon Jennys £250 up front fee per share and £35 a month per share quotes.
Some people have mentioned a share for a spouse or partner or friend. Can they check this out and report back here if anymore shares can be taken.
Last edited by glennie1970 on Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:30 am; edited 4 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shamardal84 Group Performer


Joined: 28 Jul 2006 Posts: 3977 Location: Washington (Near Newcastle)
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, Im willing to go in for 1 share, but I cant really tell how much a share is gonna be? ive read ths thread through and through and im wondering approx how much a share will cost a year? I can probably go up to about £1000 a year, but id prefer it to be nearer the £500 mark |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shamardal84 Group Performer


Joined: 28 Jul 2006 Posts: 3977 Location: Washington (Near Newcastle)
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh wait, £670 a year for a share! ive worked it out now, sorry, took me a while. Sounds good  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
glennie1970 Handicapper

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 471 Location: Ashford, Kent UK
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| shamardal84 wrote: | Oh wait, £670 a year for a share! ive worked it out now, sorry, took me a while. Sounds good  |
shamardal 1 share is an inital investment of £250 plus £35.00 per month ongoing.
I have added you to my updated thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rapidlateheadway Listed Winner


Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 938 Location: Moray
|
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Glennie,
I`ll know more about my friends interest later this week. Toastie will be out of hospital today and I`m sure he`ll be on line to voice his own views on the matter.
B.R.
Rapid |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jennywales Group Performer


Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 10205 Location: Wales
|
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
For information: please could everyone read the Trainer thread, where I report on information received from Kim Bailey. In summary, he suggests that £20,000 a year (£1,666 per month, £41.65 per month per share) is a realistic amount for training fees, and this DOES NOT include vet fees of any sort (sent direct to syndicate manager), colours, jockey fees, entries, insurance, and Weatherby's registration fee.
Again to summarise, I have asked how people feel about £45 per share monthly contribution. In addition, I have asked how people feel about a 50%/75% stake, with the remaining shares held by the trainer.
At the moment we have 28 potential shares taken up, which is NOT ENOUGH! on the basis that 40 shares will produce the £10,000 purchase price (£250 up front) plus £34.37 per month training fee contribution per share. Which on Bailey's figures will not anyway be enough.
I want to discuss face to face with Richard Lee what his all-in fee includes (if it is genuinely all-in, then we are OK on £250/£34.37, but need 12 more shareholders assuming one share each).
Oh dear!
Thoughts, please. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rapidlateheadway Listed Winner


Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 938 Location: Moray
|
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I`ve posted on the trainer thread that we should have £250 for the purchase and a £100 call up fee(which can be called up when required by the finance DIRECTOR ). This will give us a cushion should we need it.
Rapid |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jennywales Group Performer


Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 10205 Location: Wales
|
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Rapid - I was so keen to get the info from Bailey out I put it in the wrong place!
£350 up front then - but what about subsequent years? We can't assume that the £4,000 would remain untouched. Might cover us for a couple of years with luck, but need to think about this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
glennie1970 Handicapper

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 471 Location: Ashford, Kent UK
|
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am okay with 350 up front but don't want to go above £50 if I can help it.
My wife has told me I have to pay for this out of my own money..but I give all my money to her..lol
Anyway's please note my wish to keep it at £50 or under per month...after all this is a long term commitment.
May I ask what will happen if 8 months down the line someone wishes to drop out of the syndicate?
do we have to buy them out or something else? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sky_Of_Darkness Group Performer

Joined: 17 May 2006 Posts: 2941 Location: Amsterdam
|
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would suggest that the initial purchase amount is non-refundable and if someone wants to / is forced to drop out, then they will be responsible for finding a replacement, unless someone within the syndicate already has someone in mind. Obviously we'd all try and help out.
As for the monthly costs, I think also that 3 months notice should be given, so that we're not suddenly short of funds. The way to do this would be maybe to ask for 3-months in advance when we set up the syndicate.
Just some ideas, but I guess this'll be a main question at our 1st meeting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rapidlateheadway Listed Winner


Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 938 Location: Moray
|
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think you are right Sky. All these sort of things must be built in before we start. We certainly dont want to be left high and dry because someone has pulled out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|