 |
forum.sports-pro.co.uk A discussion forum devoted to people who want to talk about sports and sports betting! People without a sense of humour need not apply!!
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Are you interested in being in a racehorse ownership group? |
| Yes |
|
72% |
[ 16 ] |
| No |
|
27% |
[ 6 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 22 |
|
| Author |
Message |
glennie1970 Handicapper

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 471 Location: Ashford, Kent UK
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jennywales wrote: | | glennie1970 wrote: | has anyone considered different levels of commitment.
If you Split the horse into 30 shares of £400 each then that would give you £12000 to purchase a horse. Some of the more affluent people might want to consider 2 or 3 shares but someone a little less well off might be able to go with £400.
Monthly contribution would be pro rata in this way as would prize money etc.
This would perhaps open it up to more people.
I like the idea of being involved but have large commitments in the house I have just bought so the £1000 and the higher monthly payment are out of reach for me at the moment. |
Glennie, thanks for this. Obviously, if we don't get enough takers (which I suspect we won't) for a co-ownership/syndicate arrangement, then shares according to ability to pay would certainly be an option.
I see both advantages and disadvantages. It would involve more people and reduce per head costs, but at the same time increase the administrative burden (most trainers say that they require one member of a group to act for the group - for obvious reasons - and if 40 or more are in the group, and being consulted on all important issues, the person who does this would have a red-hot email account, not to mention the time it would take!) Also, with a big group there is much more scope for arguments and differences, unless people are prepared to delegate decision-making; but this would take a good deal of the fun out of it, at least as I see it. This is a not-for-profit enterprise, and the admin would have to be done on the basis of volunteering and goodwill.
And importantly, in the event of high vet fees (insurance against vet fees is being researched by GP) we would have to include an agreement that these would also be paid for according to share - otherwise, a few members might be left "holding the baby".
I certainly don't discount this sort of arrangement, but it would increase the administrative burden by a good deal. And unless ALL the members trust the person who is communicating with the trainer, it won't work! Of course, for the same reason a smaller group might not work, but as someone who is (when not farming!) a management consultant, I know that "the bigger the group, the more the problems"!
More thoughts, please. I realise it is not easy, and there are a host of considerations, but unless we wade through the detail we are likely to get caught out in one way or another. |
If this does look a viable proposition it would be useful to know how much would be the monthly cost per share.
Then people could indicate how much of a share they would be after.
Whilst it is likely this will mean more syndicate members this is not necessarily the case. If you remember that the original figure quoted was £1000 as a ball park. Well 3 shares here would cost an individual just £200 more(£1200 for a 10 percent stake)
I am positive that I could commit to 1 share at £400, with a minimal monthly contribution.
Might be worth just totting up the figures and asking what people think.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mansfield Toon Group Performer


Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 4127 Location: Milton Keynes
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jennywales wrote: | Good point, Mansfield. If there were 40 members, 6 runs per year, then 6/7 badges per run isn't by any means over the top, and we could probably get more - but we're not likely, unless lightning strikes, to end up with a Motivator. I don't know how this is sorted out with other syndicates. Anyone know?
I think the difference between Motivator and Soviet Song is that Motivator is owned by a large syndicate, while Elite is a "Racing Club" (remember the huge argument about payback from the sale of Elite horses? The Club was apparently set up so that ownership of the horses remained with the organisers of the Club, which was run for profit.) Don't think we want to go down that road...... |
God no we dont want to be going down the leite racing club route!!!
Yuck!
But what I'm saying is that the obvious benefit to owning your own rather than buying a share or joining a racing club, is that as owners we would be wanting to ick up the prizes, share the champagne, be in the parde ring etc...
I know this is assuming alot, but these things need ironing out! I dont want to be waving at YaiYam and Jair lording it with the bigwigs while I'm stuck on picnic hill
You know what I mean anyways, it wouldnt bother me if every time the horse ran, 15 went in the main grandstand and 5 acted as owners for the day and we took it on a rota...
Enough ramblings Im sure I know what I mean....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jairducochet Listed Winner

Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 982
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jenny - I think this sounds like an excellent idea, as i have said previously the initial down payment is no problem for me, its the monthly costings, smaller the better,
Mansfield - Owners badges would have to be on a rota system, irrelevant to how many shares you hold.
We would all be equal, could not be any other way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mansfield Toon Group Performer


Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 4127 Location: Milton Keynes
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jairducochet wrote: | Jenny - I think this sounds like an excellent idea, as i have said previously the initial down payment is no problem for me, its the monthly costings, smaller the better,
Mansfield - Owners badges would have to be on a rota system, irrelevant to how many shares you hold.
We would all be equal, could not be any other way. |
What about if you had shares and me just 1?
Surely you would have 3 times more owners badges? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jairducochet Listed Winner

Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 982
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mansfield
To make it fair and we would all have to agree on this, that irrelevant to how many shares you have, it has to be equal passes, otherwise it will not work and people will start to fall out
Once that starts happening, we no longer have a syndicate
But its a fair point and its an area that needs to be addressed.
I would always share with you Ant, so no worries there.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YAIYAM Group Performer


Joined: 21 Feb 2006 Posts: 9130
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mansfield wrote
I know this is assuming alot, but these things need ironing out! I dont want to be waving at YaiYam and Jair lording it with the bigwigs while I'm stuck on picnic hill
quote]
Do not worry about this Mansfield i would go with all the other members and i tend to go where i think the best views or places to be are.
Cheltenham is a great example for me it is the Best Mate Enclosure everytime.
Only racecourses like Newbury, Wincanton, Bath and especially Salisbury (people who have been there will know what i mean)do i pay the higher prices.
The French trainer @ Lambourn, Auvray is it looks like he could be worth talking to _________________ Forest are Treemendous
Hear The Echo has more chance than Numbersixvalverde did |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jennywales Group Performer


Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 10207 Location: Wales
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Last post of night. I have emailed a few trainers. I have already had a reply, from Richard Lee, yard near Ludlow, Shropshire.
His deal for groups on TRAINING FEES is £1375 per month all in (including vet fees - the only reservation is that the all-in price does not cover surgery or EIPH /blood vessel treatment). Coincidentally, my next door neighbour has had a horse in training with him, and she seemed very satisfied with the treatment she got - her horse (mare) is now coming home to next door with foal at foot. Also, I declare an interest in that the yard is reasonably accessible from me!
I await replies from others and will let you know.
The sums go thus - per month payments for training fees, for 20 shares = £68.75 and for 40 = £34.37 . Capital costs still to be divided, but 20 x £500 = £10,000. 40 x £250 = £10,000. So 1 share on this basis would be £500 + £68.75 per month (for 20 members) and £250 + £34.37 per month (for 40 members).
Clearly, some will be able to afford more than 1 share. But I think £250 + £34.37 per month must be considered a minimum to buy one share, and make the thing viable. Capital costs would reduce if we bought for less than £10,000.
Totally agree with Jair - all members to be treated the same, regardless of how many shares they hold - and would this apply to prize money (assuming we get any!) as well? Or would any prize be used to reduce running costs? I would definitely prefer that, but others may not, and in any case, unless we strike extremely lucky, it is unlikely to be an issue!
I don't suppose other trainers would charge very much different.
I would be prepared to contribute £1,000 to purchase, and £68.75 per month training fees - so in effect 2.5 shares!
How about everyone else? How many shares (NOT members) at £250 + £34.37 per month can we muster? This is NOT a requirement, but will give a good indication of whether the idea is viable or not. If loads of people want to join, or quite a few would be able to buy more than 1 share, the costs go down (but the admin headaches go up!)
Come on, we can do it!!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mansfield Toon Group Performer


Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 4127 Location: Milton Keynes
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| £35 a month I could easily do. The £250 upfront would need serious consideration |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YAIYAM Group Performer


Joined: 21 Feb 2006 Posts: 9130
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This looks good and he is a good trainer as well.
If i had more shares than other people or vice versa i would not expect to get any special treatment or any less, it would just be some good days out _________________ Forest are Treemendous
Hear The Echo has more chance than Numbersixvalverde did |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mansfield Toon Group Performer


Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 4127 Location: Milton Keynes
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| YAIYAM wrote: | This looks good and he is a good trainer as well.
If i had more shares than other people or vice versa i would not expect to get any special treatment or any less, it would just be some good days out |
Ok, but a 10% share means you get 10% of prize money surely.
Also, I would not object to those with a larger share getting more members passes or whatever race day privialges owners get. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
glennie1970 Handicapper

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 471 Location: Ashford, Kent UK
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I could do one share for definate but maybe 2. I am saving as we speak  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jennywales Group Performer


Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 10207 Location: Wales
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Glennie - good man!
Mansfield - personally I would be against sharing any prizes (assuming we are so lucky) on a percentage basis to individuals. I think any prizes (optimism rules) should be put back into the pot as a whole to reduce the monthly contribution per share (pro rata, so that those with more than 1 share get a better reduction). I think we must be realistic and assume that any prizes would not wipe out the need to make a monthly contribution, however small! Can see I'm going to have to go in for an accountant's qualification!
Everyone - please post your possible numbers of shares on the £250/£34.37 basis. This is only an indication - the price of a share may go up (or down - why does that sound familiar?) according to how many shares we can "sell".
The email from Richard Lee's yard invited me to visit. I can't do that until after 17 August, but if you all agree, I could visit then (any day up till at least mid-September). And would anyone else be interested in joining me? The more the merrier - different views and opinions.
Also, the Lee stables are exclusively NH - would this put off those who have expressed a preference for the Flat?
More feedback, more, more...... : : |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SkankyMinga Group Performer


Joined: 21 Feb 2006 Posts: 3719 Location: Medway
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would seriously be interested in 1 share at the rate of £250/£34.37. The £250 would be ok as it will be a one off and the monthly rate would be easily manageable.
I know I said no before but at this sort of rate I would like to get involved. I am happy to go NH too. I know I said I would prefer a flat racer but I am willing to go with what appears to be the majority. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
golfswing Group Performer


Joined: 23 Feb 2006 Posts: 2443 Location: shrewsbury
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jen 250/34-37 sounds ok by me.. _________________ A tips only a good one if its a winning one |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kickingkyle Group Performer


Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 6612 Location: Leicester
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the above cost sounds realistic to me, certainly if i get a job sorted sooner rather than later. The 250 shouldnt be a problem (wouldnt of been but have got to pay 400quid to get my car repaired ) I like the flat going on to a NH horse idea. But if it had to be 1 then im easy. _________________ Wolves winner 20.1.08 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|